Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $23.77 vs $140.41
- Up to 80% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12600K - $0.16 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Celeron G4900 - 193 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
169
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
20%
Price, €
€155.85
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |