Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 1106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - $23.77 vs $113.62
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 5600G - $0.15 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 198 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
23%
Price, €
€126.12
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |