Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1675 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 54 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
