Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - €60.24 vs €124.15
- Up to 44% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-6300 - €0.37 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €124.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
