Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €123.31 vs €148.12
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600 - €0.92 vs €1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-6300 - 142 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
134
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
88%
Price, €
€148.12
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |