Buy on Amazon
€123.31
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 730 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €123.31 vs €180.62
- Up to 32% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.72 vs €1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €123.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
67%
Price, €
€180.62
68%
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
