Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 792 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 256 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €157.91 vs €180.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.62 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |