Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770K - 119 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €180.0 vs €221.4
- Up to 23% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3770K - €1.51 vs €1.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18299 minutes ago
Buy for €221.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |