Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3243 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3770K - 159 vs 146 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €154.89 vs €221.4
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3770K - €0.97 vs €1.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €221.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13079 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13080 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |