Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9500T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9500T is 213 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500T - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €159.99 vs €180.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.45 vs €1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18066 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |