Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 240 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €181.05 vs €203.31
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-7600K - €0.67 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 277 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €181.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for €203.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |