Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €123.26 vs €299.16
- Up to 58% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10600K - €0.57 vs €1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-6300 - 219 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
216
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12284 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
41%
Price, €
€299.16
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |