Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €123.26 vs €307.81
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-13600K - €0.18 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than Core i3-6300 - 861 vs 691 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
691
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12966 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
861
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
50%
Price, €
€307.81
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €307.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |