Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 961 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €123.26 vs €290.43
- Up to 57% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 2700X - €0.36 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-6300 - 344 vs 343 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
343
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12519 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
344
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
42%
Price, €
€290.43
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12520 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |