Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 104 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 51 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €123.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |