Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2479 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-965 - 231 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-965 - €51.08 vs €66.63
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74216 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
