Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 3374 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - €66.63 vs €74.85
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Core i7-965 - 157 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-965 - €0.48 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 577 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.85
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |