Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 111% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1620 - 483 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €20.16 vs €152.29
- Up to 72% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-13100 - €0.09 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 55 vs 60 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €152.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
229
47%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |