Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1899 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 17 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 1007U - 112 vs 108 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |