Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 954 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 1007U - 129 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
