Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 45% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3900 - 155 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Diablo IV than Celeron G3900 - €0.48 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €53.15 vs €74.07
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
71%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13315 minutes ago
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |