Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1861 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - €74.07 vs €89.07
- Up to 14% better value when playing New World than Core i5-4690K - €0.69 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 5% better in New World than Ryzen 3 3200G - 112 vs 107 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
107
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12998 minutes ago
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |