Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1812 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3200G - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €55.85 vs €74.07
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.37 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14389 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |