Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €55.85 vs €91.6
- Up to 39% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-10400F - €0.28 vs €0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i3-4370 - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
198
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7119 minutes ago
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |