Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4440 - 101 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €59.04 vs €74.07
- Up to 19% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.59 vs €0.73 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12453 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
100
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |