Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €89.07 vs €91.6
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-4690K - 103 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-4690K - €0.89 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3024 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |