Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €155.88 vs €309.99
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |