Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €155.88 vs €315.7
- Up to 29% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-13600K - €1.0 vs €1.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 44% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - 224 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
70%
Price, €
€315.7
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €315.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |