Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €309.99 vs €349.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 287 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
91.28919860627178%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€309.99
100%
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
58.467186782927946%
Multi-Core
7454
84.25454956482423%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |