Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €155.88 vs €292.53
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - €1.71 vs €2.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - 113 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
66%
Price, €
€292.53
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |