Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-6600K - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €59.0 vs €319.57
- Up to 80% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900KF - €0.46 vs €2.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 91 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
19%
Price, €
€319.57
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €319.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for €59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |