Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €155.88 vs €191.69
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.62 vs €0.72 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 268 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |