Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700 - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €157.91 vs €318.6
- Up to 48% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10900KF - €0.91 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
51%
Price, €
€318.6
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18759 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
174
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |