Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €155.88 vs €337.57
- Up to 44% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900KF - €1.4 vs €2.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 134 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
82.83582089552239%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
55.55555555555555%
Price, €
€337.57
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €337.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |