Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3476 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 212 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €154.27 vs €385.16
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - €0.9 vs €1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
49%
Price, €
€385.16
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €385.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12971 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |