Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3451 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €155.88 vs €458.65
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-12900KS - €0.96 vs €2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 194 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
40%
Price, €
€458.65
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |