Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 215 days older than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2420 - 156 vs 155 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |