Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1695 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2420 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
372
36.57817109144543%
Multi-Core
1815
64.68282252316465%
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |