Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Ryzen 5 2600 - 189 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$142.72 vs CA$565.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.78 vs CA$2.99 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.99/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$565
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4147 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
182
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |