Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-9100 - 186 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$160.0 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.99 vs CA$2.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.55/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
161
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$160
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$160 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |