Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-6600 - 152 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$141.67 vs CA$565.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.09 vs CA$3.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.72/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$565
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10749 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
130
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |