Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 27% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6100 - 198 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$98.43 vs CA$363.26
- Up to 66% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$363.26
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$363.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
156
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |