Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 315 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-12100F - 255 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$109.0 vs CA$400.1
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
255
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$400.1
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5098 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
253
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |