Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1600 - 199 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$250.0 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900K - CA$1.51 vs CA$2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$400
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
166
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |