Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1620 - 594 vs 439 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$36.89 vs CA$246.41
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.08 vs CA$0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
594
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$246.41
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
439
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |