Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4785T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4785T is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-4785T - CA$32.99 vs CA$196.3
- Up to 83% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-4785T - CA$0.19 vs CA$1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Celeron G1620 - 180 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
176
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2163 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$196.3
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4785T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |