Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$36.89 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Celeron G1620 - 185 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13904 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$249
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |