Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3409 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$32.99 vs CA$239.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$0.37 vs CA$2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 21% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1620 - 109 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10873 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
109
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.19/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$239
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$239 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |