Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$36.89 vs CA$221.56
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.07 vs CA$0.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1620 - 571 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
503
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
571
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$221.56
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$221.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |