Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - CA$36.89 vs CA$225.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-8600K - CA$0.24 vs CA$1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1620 - 180 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$225
16%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8600K 3.6 Ghz 6-Core Lga 1151 Processor 3.6 BX80684I58600K
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
